|
|
|
|
|
|
HENRY
MOORE |
|
|
It
is a mistake for a sculptor or a painter to speak or write very often about
his job. It releases tension needed for his work. But trying to express his
aims with rounded-off logical exactness, he can easily become a theorist whose
actual work is only a caged-in exposition of conceptions evolved in terms of
logic and words. But though the non-logical, instinctive, subconscious part
of the mind must play its part in his work, he also has a conscious mind which
is not inactive. The artist works with a concentration of his whole personality,
and the conscious part of it resolves conflicts, organizes memories, and prevents
him from trying to walk in two directions at the same time.
It is likely, then, that a sculptor can give, from his own conscious experience,
clues which will help others in their approach to sculpture.
Henry Moore: The Sculptor Speaks, in "The Listener"
London 1937 |
|
Sculpture,
for me, must have life in it, vitality. It must have a feeling for organic
form, a certain pathos and warmth. Purely abstract sculpture seems to me to
be an activity that would be better fulfilled in another art, such as architecture.
That is why I have never been tempted to remain a purely abstract sculptor.
Abstract sculptures are too often but models for monuments that are never
carried out, and the works of many abstract or 'constructivist' sculptors
suffer from this frustration in that the artist never gets around to finding
the real material solution to his problems. But sculpture is different from
architecture. It creates organisms that must be complete in themselves. An
architect has to deal with practical considerations, such as comfort costs
and so on, which remain alien to an artist, very real problems that are different
from those which a sculptor has to face [...] A sculpture must have its own
life. Rather than give the impression of a smaller object carved out of a
bigger block, it should make the observer feel that what he is seeing contains
within itself its own organic energy thrusting outwards – if a work
of sculpture has its own life and form, it will be alive and expansive, seeming
larger than the stone or wood from which it is carved. It should always give
the impression, whether carved or modeled, of having grown organically, created
by pressure from within.
Edouard Roditi, Dialogues on Art, Secker and Warburg, London
1960
|
|
The
average man, who's got very little time to look at sculpture and painting, looking
at sculpture such as mine, would find such work puzzling and strange. I think
this is natural because for over twenty years I, like most artists, have been
thinking all day long about sculpture and painting, and if after all that I
can only produce something which the average man, who has very little time to
think about it, would immediately recognize as something he would have done
if he'd had the technical experience, then I think that my time would not have
been very profitably spent. I think that is true of the past too, and that all
good art demands an effort from the observer and he should demand that it extends
his experiences of life. Art and Life, The living Image, in 'The Listener',
Vol. XXVI, No. 670, London 1941
Flintstones, pebbles, shells and driftwood have all helped me to start off ideas,
but far more important to me has been the human figure and its inner skeleton
structure. You can feel that a bone has had some sort of use in its life; it
has experienced tensions, has supported weights and has actually performed an
organic function, which a pebble has not done at all. In themselves pebbles
are dead forms, their shape is accidental, and merely to copy them would not
in itself create a sculptural form. It is what I see in them that gives them
their significance.
John Hedgecoe, Henry Moore, Henry Moore, Nelson, London 1968 |
|
Sculpture
should always at first sight have some obscurities, and further meanings.
People should want to go on looking and thinking; it should never tell all
about itself immediately. Initially both sculpture and painting must need
effort to be fully appreciated, or else it is just an empty immediacy like
a poster, which is designed to be read by the people on top of a bus in half
a second. In fact all art should have some more mystery and meaning to it
than is apparent to a quick observer. In my sculpture, explanations often
come afterwards. I do not make a sculpture to a program or because I have
a particular idea I am trying to express. While working, I change parts because
I do not like them in such a way that I hope I am going to like them better.
The kind of alteration I make is not thought out; I do not say to myself -
this is too big, or too small. I just look at it and, if I do not like it
I change it. I work from likes and dislikes, and not by literary logic. Not
by words, but by being satisfied with form. Afterwards I can explain or find
reasons for it, but that is rationalization after the event. I can look at
old sculptures and find meanings in them and explanations which at the time
were not in my mind at all - not consciously anyway.
John Hedgecoe, Henry Moore, Henry Moore, Nelson, London 1978

|